Dear Ulf,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:31:59 +0200
Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 3 June 2015 at 10:34, David Jander wrote:
> > In the (not so unlikely) case that the mmc controller timeout budget is
> > enough for exactly one erase-group, the simplification of allowing one
> > sector has an enormous perfor
On Wednesday 24 June 2015 21:54:01 Vinod Koul wrote:
> > It would be nice to find another name for the
> > dma_request_slave_channel_compat() so with the new name we could have chance
> > to rearrange the parameters: (dev, name, mask, fn, fn_param)
> >
> > We would end up with the following APIs,
As per DW MobileStorage databook "each descriptor can transfer up to 4kB
of data in chained mode", moreover buffer size that is put in "des1" is
limited to 13 bits, i.e. for example on attempt to
IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(desc, 8192) size value that's effectively written
will be 0.
On the platform wi