Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-bcm2835: Actually enable the clock

2015-05-29 Thread Eric Anholt
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:03:12PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: We're currently using a fixed frequency clock specified in the DT, so enabling is a no-op. However, the RPi firmware-based clocks driver can actually disable unused clocks, so

[PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-bcm2835: Actually enable the clock

2015-05-29 Thread Eric Anholt
We're currently using a fixed frequency clock specified in the DT, so enabling is a no-op. However, the RPi firmware-based clocks driver can actually disable unused clocks, so when switching to use it we ended up losing our MMC clock once all devices were probed. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e

[PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: sdhci-bcm2835: Clean up platform allocations if sdhci init fails.

2015-05-29 Thread Eric Anholt
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm2835.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm2835.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm2835.c index 0ef0343..32f4046 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm2835.c +++ b

[PATCH] mmc: sdhci-bcm2835: Actually enable the clock

2015-05-28 Thread Eric Anholt
We're currently using a fixed frequency clock specified in the DT, so enabling is a no-op. However, the RPi firmware-based clocks driver can actually disable unused clocks, so when switching to use it we ended up losing our MMC clock once all devices were probed. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e