On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:33:19 -0400, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Manoj,
On Thu, Mar 31 2011, Manoj wrote:
Card did not mount. New dmesg is attached.
Okay. There's nothing in the log about Ricoh, which probably means
that
it bailed out early in the function. You could add a printk
@vger.kernel.org linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Philip Langdale phil...@overt.org
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c | 41
+
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |3 ++- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
|4 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
will be delayed maximum by 2 seconds
I suspect it's probably sending an SD id command to the card and then that
has to time out on MMC cards.
Acked-by: Philip Langdale phil...@overt.org
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c |3 ++-
drivers
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:37:32 +0300
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 19:11 -0400, Philip Langdale wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:28:50 +0300, Maxim Levitsky
maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
The current way of disabling it is not well tested by vendor
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:07:28 +0300
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On this subject:
1) Would it make sense to have the hard-coded caps reflect the full
set of caps you see on the sdhci side?
This would be ugly cause two driver instances would have to talk one
with
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:31:49 +0300
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:11 -0700, Philip Langdale wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 04:16:27 +0300
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
The current way of disabling it is not well tested by vendor
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 04:16:27 +0300
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
The current way of disabling it is not well tested by vendor
and has all kinds of bugs that show up on resume from ram/disk.
Old way of disabling is still supported by
continuing to use CONFIG_MMC_RICOH_MMC.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 09:39:14 -0700
Philip Langdale phil...@overt.org wrote:
Have you been able to establish if 4bit and high-speed operations
work correctly through the MMC controller? I note that you didn't
set SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD.
Didn't test that yet, will do.
I hope my MMCPlus
file mode 100644
index f627905..000
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/ricoh_mmc.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,262 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * ricoh_mmc.c - Dummy driver to disable the Rioch MMC controller.
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2007 Philip Langdale, All Rights Reserved.
- *
- * This program is free software; you
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:10:33 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I have nothing against this, but, even Linus himself stated that
he dislikes broken printk lines.
I also noticed that some DECLARE_FIXUP in this file are longer that
80, and since breaking this doesn't
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:43:50 -0800
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
(cc linux-mmc)
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 07:40:01 -0800
Philip Langdale phil...@overt.org wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:24:44 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 23:55
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:09:52 +0100
David Vrabel david.vra...@csr.com wrote:
Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
To allow the usage of MMC_VDD_165_195, host capability
MMC_CAP_VDD_165_195 is introduced. This is necessary
because MMC_VDD_165_195 is currently
12 matches
Mail list logo
