ite buffer at suspend time, so that you can
remove this choice for good?
--
Stefan Richter
-=-==--= =-== =---=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
block layer data
6. low-level can now clean up/ free its own data
Does the MMC layer miss step 2? Because without this, step 4 would be
in vain.
--
Stefan Richter
-=-==--= =-== ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the
Stefan Richter wrote:
> I dare say without knowing the MMC and block system: It is not a
> locking issue, it is a reference counting issue.
[...]
> The whole secret is not to forget to count _all_ references.
PS, in case that it might be needed: Sometimes a low level wants to
wai
t queue.
PS: The kref API is based on an atomic counter so that there is
fundamentally never a need to use locking (mutual exclusion) for proper
reference counting and proper deferral of object destruction. The whole
secret is not to forget to count _all_ references.
--
Stefan Richter
-=-==--
rt->icount.overrun);
> if (port->icount.cts)
[...]
The style problem of the original code was not indentation, but depth of
indentation levels. Why not factor this cascade out to a
show_icount_fields() function?
Plus, I hope Jiri enhanced your changelog a
