Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski
Cc: Ulf Hansson
Cc: H Hartley Sweeten
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc: Simon Baatz
Cc: Laurent Pinchart
Cc: Tejun Heo
Signed-off-by: Shaibal Dutta
[zoran.marko...@linaro.org: Rebased to latest kernel. Added commit message.
Fixed code alignment.]
Signed-off-by: Zoran Markovic
I like the simplified approach taken in this patch. Shortening the
awake time by trying to call __pm_relax() in all corner cases turned
out to be too complex.
Reviewed-by: Zoran Markovic
Regards, Zoran
On 1 October 2013 02:22, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>> So how does the
Hi Ulf,
I like the fact that wakeups are now quite simplified. A couple of
comments below:
> By signaling the wakeup event for a time of 5 s for devices configured
> as wakeup capable, we likely will be prevent a sleep long enough to let
> user space consume the event.
Given that there is no pm_re
Hi Ulf,
Thanks for reviewing this, it was very helpful!
> 1. mmc_detect_change does obviously not have to be run the same number
> of times as the mmc_rescan function. In other words, the calls to
> __pm_stay_awake is not paired with __pm_relay, I suppose this does not
> matter?
It shouldn't, sinc
Ulf,
> I got confirmation from Broadcom that all cell phone reference designs
> have card insert/removal configured as a wakeup IRQ. Unless our
> customers change that - which I doubt - this results in a considerable
> number of products implementing this feature.
>
> Please let me know how you wis
proceed.
Cheers,
Zoran
On 26 June 2013 13:57, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 21:58, Zoran Markovic wrote:
>>>> This patch is ported from the Android common tree, so you've probably
>>>> been using it.
>>>
>>> We removed more or less all An
>> This patch is ported from the Android common tree, so you've probably
>> been using it.
>
> We removed more or less all Android code in the mmc subsystem, since
> it just didn't work. :-)
>
> The "deferred resume" was very useful though, so after some rework we
> kept it and could then improve t
> I am not sure I understand why this patch is needed. When a new card
> is inserted/removed and the upper levels gets notification about the
> new card, triggering the mounting/un-mounting of the file system, why
> should it be the lowest layer (mmc) that prevents the platform from
> enter suspend
ed to use
wakeup_source_register/unregister instead of wakeup_source_init/trash,
added the missing __pm_relax() for non-removable devices in mmc_rescan().]
Signed-off-by: Zoran Markovic
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 31 +--
drivers/mmc/core/host.c |7 +++
in
