On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Ian Molton wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Thanks for your patches. I'll roll them in with my patches so that
> this all goes in as one patchset, if thats ok with you?
Of course. No need to create broken (for ASIC3) intermediate commits,
if it can be avoided.
cheers
Phil
Since the CNF area code is abstracted out from tmio_mmc, ASIC3 has to handle it
itself.
Use tmio_core for common operations.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
---
drivers/mfd/asic3.c | 43 +++
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a
is code
> still allows us to build a kernel that supports machines with
> differing bus shifts to each other...
Hi Ian,
I've tested your patches up to 0004 on hx4700 with the following
additional modifications to the 0001 CNF abstraction patch:
From: Philipp Zabel
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 1
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
> I'd prefer to see both the superH and ASIC3 MFD core drivers working
> with the new tmio-mmc.c without needing changes made to tmoi-mmc.c
> before we merge anything. I expect you can get the superH MFD driver
> written in about 15 minutes (copy t
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2009, 13:52 +0100 schrieb Ian Molton:
> Hi guys,
>
> This is the full TMIO MMC patchset, compiled, tested, checkpatch passed.
With bus shift support dropped from the SD_CONFIG register accessors, I
can't use this as-is on ASIC3. What do you think about the following
(sketc
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
> *prod*
>
> After all the fuss about this, no-ones going to comment?
>
> I just found the last tmio-related bug I want to squash before I
> consider this patchset 'good to go' so people actually updatinng their
> drivers / sending me code would b
