Matt Fleming writes:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:51:21AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> I don't see a reason either, but it requires patching the MMC core as
>> well as all the users. As I'm not an MMC core person, I thought this
>> best left to someone in that domain.
>>
>> Fixing the core
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:51:21AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
> I don't see a reason either, but it requires patching the MMC core as
> well as all the users. As I'm not an MMC core person, I thought this
> best left to someone in that domain.
>
> Fixing the core and callers could easily be do
Matt Fleming writes:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:57:16 -0700, Kevin Hilman
> wrote:
>>
>> Note that dev_pm_ops version of the suspend hook no longer takes a
>> 'state' argument. However, the MMC core function mmc_suspend_host()
>> still takes a 'state' argument, but it is unused, so a dummy
>> s
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:57:16 -0700, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
>
> Note that dev_pm_ops version of the suspend hook no longer takes a
> 'state' argument. However, the MMC core function mmc_suspend_host()
> still takes a 'state' argument, but it is unused, so a dummy
> state variable was created to pas
Convert PM operations to use dev_pm_ops. This will facilitate
the runtime PM coversion which will add to dev_pm_ops hooks.
Note that dev_pm_ops version of the suspend hook no longer takes a
'state' argument. However, the MMC core function mmc_suspend_host()
still takes a 'state' argument, but it
