2010/9/4 Adrian Hunter :
> One of our contractors had a look at the patch and had this comment:
>
> One comment/question:
> /host/mmci.c in function
> "static int __devexit mmci_remove(struct amba_device *dev)" there is code:
> if (regulator_is_enabled(host->vcc))
> regulator_dis
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:38:45PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This has an Reveiwed-by from the regulator maintainer and
> seems to address all comments, noone is objection so Andrew
> can you pick it up?
Just to clarify, I'm only one of the regulator maintainers - Liam also
maintains the regul
Linus Walleij wrote:
2010/8/31 Linus Walleij :
After discovering a problem in regulator reference counting I
took Mark Brown's advice to move the reference count into the
MMC core by making the regulator status a member of
struct mmc_host.
This has an Reveiwed-by from the regulator maintainer
2010/8/31 Linus Walleij :
> After discovering a problem in regulator reference counting I
> took Mark Brown's advice to move the reference count into the
> MMC core by making the regulator status a member of
> struct mmc_host.
This has an Reveiwed-by from the regulator maintainer and
seems to add
After discovering a problem in regulator reference counting I
took Mark Brown's advice to move the reference count into the
MMC core by making the regulator status a member of
struct mmc_host.
I took this opportunity to also implement NULL versions of
the regulator functions so as to rid the drive
