Hi,
On Tue, May 28 2013, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On 05/28/13 6:15 PM, James Hogan wrote:
>> On 27/05/13 05:47, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> > At Interrupt status register, Bit9 is Data Read Timeout.
>> > But we used macro name as the DTO. It could be confused with the Data
>> > Transfer Over(DTO)-Bit[3]
On 05/28/13 6:15 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> On 27/05/13 05:47, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> > At Interrupt status register, Bit9 is Data Read Timeout.
> > But we used macro name as the DTO. It could be confused with the Data
> > Transfer Over(DTO)-Bit[3].
> > it's clearly that is changed the DRTO instead o
On 27/05/13 05:47, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> At Interrupt status register, Bit9 is Data Read Timeout.
> But we used macro name as the DTO. It could be confused with the Data
> Transfer Over(DTO)-Bit[3].
> it's clearly that is changed the DRTO instead of DTO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
Reviewe
At Interrupt status register, Bit9 is Data Read Timeout.
But we used macro name as the DTO. It could be confused with the Data
Transfer Over(DTO)-Bit[3].
it's clearly that is changed the DRTO instead of DTO.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
---
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |4 ++--
drivers/mmc/host
