Will Newton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Wolfram Sang
wrote:
> >
> >> The 'mshci.c' is based on 'linux/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c' and
> >> the role is exactly same with that.
> >
> > Can you sum up the differences why you cannot sdhci.c directly, please?
>
> The driver looks like i
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> The 'mshci.c' is based on 'linux/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c' and
>> the role is exactly same with that.
>
> Can you sum up the differences why you cannot sdhci.c directly, please?
The driver looks like it is for the same block (or very close
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:51:23PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > The 'mshci.c' is based on 'linux/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c' and
> > the role is exactly same with that.
>
> Can you sum up the differences why you cannot sdhci.c directly, please?
I second that.
--
Ben Dooks, b...@fluff.org, ht
> The 'mshci.c' is based on 'linux/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c' and
> the role is exactly same with that.
Can you sum up the differences why you cannot sdhci.c directly, please?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang|
Industrial Linux Sol
From: Hyunsung Jang
This patch adds support a new sdmmc controller which name is
'Mobile Storage Host Controller'. Its base version is 2.30a.
The 'mshci.c' is based on 'linux/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c' and
the role is exactly same with that.
NOTE:
This patch covers 1bit, 4bit and 8bit bus width
