Proper check should be if the hsmmc driver got its platform_data
via devicetree, and not if the devicetree is populated for the
platform.
Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org
---
The patch is more than a nit-pick because upstream doesn't yet have dt
nodes for mmc on OMAP while
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
Proper check should be if the hsmmc driver got its platform_data
via devicetree, and not if the devicetree is populated for the
platform.
Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org
Hi,
Similar patch by
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:24 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
Proper check should be if the hsmmc driver got its platform_data
via devicetree, and not if the devicetree is populated for the
platform.
This one is already fixed here..
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67879.html
On 17 April 2012 15:41, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji balaj...@ti.com wrote:
The patch is more than a nit-pick because upstream doesn't yet have dt
nodes for mmc on OMAP while the driver wrongly assumes it does.
Which isn't a problem until you use some low-end sdhc card
(Transcend 8GB Class-4 in
On 17 April 2012 15:41, Rajendra Nayak rna...@ti.com wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:24 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
Proper check should be if the hsmmc driver got its platform_data
via devicetree, and not if the devicetree is populated for the
platform.
This one is already fixed here..