Hi Guennadi,
On Mon, Mar 14 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hm, I've looked at them briefly and nothing in them struck me in them, but
> if you want a formal reviewed-by or such I'll have to look at them in more
> detail. I'm away from tomorrow until Saturday at a V4L2 meeting, so, will
>
Hi Chris
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 11 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Currently kunmap_atomic() doesn't take into account the offset, used
> > with kmap_atomic(). On platforms, where kunmap_atomic() is not a NOP,
> > this will lead to problems,
Hi Guennadi,
On Fri, Mar 11 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Currently kunmap_atomic() doesn't take into account the offset, used
> with kmap_atomic(). On platforms, where kunmap_atomic() is not a NOP,
> this will lead to problems, when offset != 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
>
Currently kunmap_atomic() doesn't take into account the offset, used
with kmap_atomic(). On platforms, where kunmap_atomic() is not a NOP,
this will lead to problems, when offset != 0.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski
---
No, I've never seen this bug trigger, so, not sure whether we need it
