Re: [PATCH] mmc-utils:add KSI eMMC 5.0 FFU support

2014-06-23 Thread Grant Grundler
Hi Darren! Did you understand what Puthikorn was asking for? linux-mmc maintainers don't care about Chrome-OS branches (stabilize-5784.0.B). Puthikorn was just pointing out the patch needs to be against something that linux-mmc can build. This Kingston support patch is a good example of why

Re: [PATCH] mmc-utils:add KSI eMMC 5.0 FFU support

2014-06-23 Thread Hsin-Hsiang Tseng
I am interested in this topic too. I have some issues want to discuss here. Should we check the firmware binary file before we execute FFU? (for example, execute checksum to verify firmware bin file) Should eMMC controller vendors cover this issue? Another issue is about interrupt, because FFU

Re: [PATCH] mmc-utils:add KSI eMMC 5.0 FFU support

2014-06-17 Thread Puthikorn Voravootivat
Hi Darren Thanks for the patch. To make the reviewers job easier, could you send the patch against [RFC PATCH 1/1 v7]mmc: Support-FFU-for-eMMC-v5.0 by avi. You can find that patch at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg26519.html Also, please include the Signed-off-by: field in the patch.