On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The regulator and MMC frameworks provide the proper stub functions
> for the regulator functions anyway, get rid of this.
I'm dropping this patch - it's wrong, because on platforms without
regulator support, it stamps over the provid
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:30:05AM +0100, Linus WALLEIJ wrote:
> > > Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for .38.
> >
> > Also queued in the ARM tree.
>
> Chris, Russell is listed as maintainer for this driver so
> he probably prefers to take in changes to it through the ARM
> tree, can you take this
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:39:08AM +, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > The regulator and MMC frameworks provide the proper stub functions
> > for the regulator functions anyway, get rid of this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linus W
Hi Linus,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The regulator and MMC frameworks provide the proper stub functions
> for the regulator functions anyway, get rid of this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c |3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The regulator and MMC frameworks provide the proper stub functions
> for the regulator functions anyway, get rid of this.
It's more that the regulator API stubs have been changed to match what
MMC is doing (there always were stubs) b
The regulator and MMC frameworks provide the proper stub functions
for the regulator functions anyway, get rid of this.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
---
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/m
