On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:30:01PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Puttagunta, Viswanath
> >> wrote:
> [...]
> >> >>> Signed-of
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Puttagunta, Viswanath
>> wrote:
[...]
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Semen Protsenko
>> >>
>> >> The implementation looks fine, but can we simply
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Puttagunta, Viswanath
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:28 PM, S, Venkatraman
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Semen Protsenko
> >> wrote:
> >>> Errata description:
> >>> Due to a
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Puttagunta, Viswanath wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:28 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Semen Protsenko
>> wrote:
>>> Errata description:
>>> Due to a bad behavior of an internal signal, the Card Error interrupt bit
>>> MMCHS_
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:28 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Semen Protsenko
> wrote:
>> Errata description:
>> Due to a bad behavior of an internal signal, the Card Error interrupt bit
>> MMCHS_STAT[28] CERR may not be set sometimes when an error occurred in the
>>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Semen Protsenko wrote:
> Errata description:
> Due to a bad behavior of an internal signal, the Card Error interrupt bit
> MMCHS_STAT[28] CERR may not be set sometimes when an error occurred in the
> card response.
>
> Workaround:
> After responses of type R1/R1b f