Re: [PATCH 0/2] sdio: make sdio_single_irq optional due to suprious IRQ

2011-06-01 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 31 May 2011 21:33, Per Forlin wrote: > > Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was > > triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to > > raise an interrupt even though there are no bits set in the C

Re: [PATCH 0/2] sdio: make sdio_single_irq optional due to suprious IRQ

2011-05-31 Thread Daniel Drake
On 31 May 2011 21:33, Per Forlin wrote: > Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was > triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to > raise an interrupt even though there are no bits set in the CCCR_INTx > register. This behaviour is not support

[PATCH 0/2] sdio: make sdio_single_irq optional due to suprious IRQ

2011-05-31 Thread Per Forlin
Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to raise an interrupt even though there are no bits set in the CCCR_INTx register. This behaviour is not supported by the sdio_single_irq feature nor the SDIO sp