Hi Arnaud,
Sorry for the late replying. Somehow I missed the message.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 08:32:33PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Shawn Guo writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very exp
Shawn Guo writes:
Hi,
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very expensive
>> in terms of the impact to system performance. We observe a few
>> system performance issues from Freescale and Linaro on mx5 platforms,
>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:29:57PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Shawn Guo writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:13:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> >> Shawn Guo writes:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> >> The card-present polling w
Shawn Guo writes:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:13:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>> Shawn Guo writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> >> The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very expensive
>> >> in terms of the impact to system
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:39:03PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:13:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> > Shawn Guo writes:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > >> The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very exp
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:13:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Shawn Guo writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very expensive
> >> in terms of the impact to system performance. We observe a f
Shawn Guo writes:
Hi,
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very expensive
>> in terms of the impact to system performance. We observe a few
>> system performance issues from Freescale and Linaro on mx5 platforms,
>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very expensive
> in terms of the impact to system performance. We observe a few
> system performance issues from Freescale and Linaro on mx5 platforms,
> which have been proved card p
The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very expensive
in terms of the impact to system performance. We observe a few
system performance issues from Freescale and Linaro on mx5 platforms,
which have been proved card polling related.
The patch set extends the current sdhci-esdhc-imx
