Hi Greg,
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:50:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:05AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
>
> Why did you send this series of patches out twice? Were they different?
>
> confused,
Looks like this patch series has reached only individual recepien
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:33:05AM +0500, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
Why did you send this series of patches out twice? Were they different?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More ma
Original patch posted at:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1194346
Enhancements done to above patch:
- checkpatch warning fixes
- added Kconfig symbol CONFIG_PROBE_DEFER
- replacing normal workqueue with singlethread_workqueue
- handling -EPROBE_DEFER error
Apart from that, OMAP
Original patch posted at:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1194346
Enhancements done to above patch:
- checkpatch warning fixes
- added Kconfig symbol CONFIG_PROBE_DEFER
- replacing normal workqueue with singlethread_workqueue
- handling -EPROBE_DEFER error
Apart from that, OMAP
