On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 18 February 2014 17:05, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> In runtime suspended state, we are not expecting IRQs and thus we can
>>> safely mask them, not only for pwrreg_no
On 18 February 2014 17:46, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> If we add SDIO irq support to mmci in future; parts of that
>> implementation includes a re-route of DAT1 to a GPIO irq when entering
>> runtime suspend state. The mmci HW w
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> If we add SDIO irq support to mmci in future; parts of that
> implementation includes a re-route of DAT1 to a GPIO irq when entering
> runtime suspend state. The mmci HW will in runtime suspend state, not
> be responsible for handling i
On 18 February 2014 17:05, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> In runtime suspended state, we are not expecting IRQs and thus we can
>> safely mask them, not only for pwrreg_nopower variants but for all.
>>
>> Obviously we then also nee
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> In runtime suspended state, we are not expecting IRQs and thus we can
> safely mask them, not only for pwrreg_nopower variants but for all.
>
> Obviously we then also need to make sure we restore the IRQ mask while
> becoming runtime r
In runtime suspended state, we are not expecting IRQs and thus we can
safely mask them, not only for pwrreg_nopower variants but for all.
Obviously we then also need to make sure we restore the IRQ mask while
becoming runtime resumed.
Cc: Russell King
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson
---
drivers/mmc
