On Thursday 25 October 2012 06:29 PM, wang.jing.windsdae...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jing Wang <windsdae...@gmail.com>
Some description of the actual effect of the change here would be nice.
For example, "Trim the error handling path in mmc_alloc_sg".
But what's the point of this patch anyway ? There are 2 "return" statements
instead of one.

Signed-off-by: Jing Wang <windsdae...@gmail.com>
---
  drivers/mmc/card/queue.c |    9 +++++----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
index e360a97..98a22a1 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
@@ -118,13 +118,14 @@ static struct scatterlist *mmc_alloc_sg(int sg_len, int 
*err)
        struct scatterlist *sg;
sg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist)*sg_len, GFP_KERNEL);
-       if (!sg)
+       if (!sg) {
                *err = -ENOMEM;
-       else {
-               *err = 0;
-               sg_init_table(sg, sg_len);
+               return sg;
        }
+ *err = 0;
+       sg_init_table(sg, sg_len);
+
        return sg;
  }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to