Just add Chris to CC.
Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi..
this patch is right.
Acked-by : Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com
Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
James Hogan wrote:
On 07/28/2011 12:03 PM, Shashidhar Hiremath wrote:
The mask used inside this macro was assuming Buffer_Size1's[BS1's]
Hi Shashidhar,
On Fri, Jul 29 2011, Will Newton wrote:
The mask used inside this macro was assuming Buffer_Size1's[BS1's]
width to be 14 bits,
it is actually of 13 bits, Modified masks used in
IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE such that
they use only 13 bits instead of current 14.
Signed-off-by:
On 07/28/2011 12:03 PM, Shashidhar Hiremath wrote:
The mask used inside this macro was assuming Buffer_Size1's[BS1's] width to
be 14 bits,
it is actually of 13 bits, Modified masks used in IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE such
that
they use only 13 bits instead of current 14.
Signed-off-by:
Hi..
this patch is right.
Acked-by : Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com
Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
James Hogan wrote:
On 07/28/2011 12:03 PM, Shashidhar Hiremath wrote:
The mask used inside this macro was assuming Buffer_Size1's[BS1's] width to
be 14 bits,
it is actually of 13 bits,
