Hi Jaehoon,
On 13 March 2013 09:50, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> this patch has already got acked-by of Seungwon and me.
It is needed for the second patch of this series
"[PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Remove unnecessary use of of_match_ptr()"
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2156621/
Hi All,
this patch has already got acked-by of Seungwon and me.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 03/13/2013 12:04 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On 12 March 2013 20:30, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>> There is also another patch in this series [1] that needs
On 12 March 2013 20:30, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> There is also another patch in this series [1] that needs your attention.
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2156621/
>
> I'd rather have one of the dw_mmc maintainers handle ACKing patches
> bef
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> There is also another patch in this series [1] that needs your attention.
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2156621/
I'd rather have one of the dw_mmc maintainers handle ACKing patches
before I apply them. If they haven't reviewed it by the t
>> -int dw_mci_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int dw_mci_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> const struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data;
>> const struct of_device_id *match;
>
> Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.10.
Thanks Chris.
There is also another
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 18 2013, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Silences the following sparse warning:
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c:218:5: warning:
> symbol 'dw_mci_exynos_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |2 +-
> 1 f
On 4 March 2013 10:06, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 18 February 2013 16:21, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>> Hi Sachin,
>>
>> You're right.
>> 'dw_mci_exynos_probe' is only used here.
>>
>> Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon
>>
>> On Monday, February 18, 2013, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>>> Acked-by: Jaehoon Ch
Hi Chris,
On 18 February 2013 16:21, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> Hi Sachin,
>
> You're right.
> 'dw_mci_exynos_probe' is only used here.
>
> Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon
>
> On Monday, February 18, 2013, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung
>>
>> On 02/18/2013 05:53 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>
Hi Sachin,
You're right.
'dw_mci_exynos_probe' is only used here.
Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon
On Monday, February 18, 2013, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung
>
> On 02/18/2013 05:53 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> > Silences the following sparse warning:
> > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung
On 02/18/2013 05:53 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Silences the following sparse warning:
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c:218:5: warning:
> symbol 'dw_mci_exynos_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-
Silences the following sparse warning:
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c:218:5: warning:
symbol 'dw_mci_exynos_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/d
11 matches
Mail list logo