On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:30:54PM +0100, Dr. Rainer Kaluscha wrote:
> The problem is that *only* a dummy regulator is available which
> refuses to do any regulation at all.
> So sdhci/mmc should better behave as no regulator was available at all.
> This may happen if e.g. in a precompiled kernel
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:36:36AM -0500, Kevin Liu wrote:
> 2013/1/7 Mark Brown :
> > No, we've been through this repeatedly. Whatever problem you're trying
> > to bodge around is going to be a problem with some real physical
> > regulators too.
> Then the only way is MUST define the regulator
Am 07.01.2013 12:25, schrieb Mark Brown:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:38:50PM +0800, Kevin Liu wrote:
Introduce a regulator_is_dummy function to check whether the
regulator is dummy.
No, we've been through this repeatedly. Whatever problem you're trying
to bodge around is going to be a problem
2013/1/7 Mark Brown :
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:38:50PM +0800, Kevin Liu wrote:
>> Introduce a regulator_is_dummy function to check whether the
>> regulator is dummy.
>
> No, we've been through this repeatedly. Whatever problem you're trying
> to bodge around is going to be a problem with some
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:38:50PM +0800, Kevin Liu wrote:
> Introduce a regulator_is_dummy function to check whether the
> regulator is dummy.
No, we've been through this repeatedly. Whatever problem you're trying
to bodge around is going to be a problem with some real physical
regulators too.
Introduce a regulator_is_dummy function to check whether the
regulator is dummy.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Liu
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 17 +
include/linux/regulator/consumer.h |6 ++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/
