On 02/20/2013 11:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
The structs wrapped with the SOC ifdefs are small enough where having
them always there shouldn't be a big overhead. Removing the ifdefs
also makes the code a little cleaner.
Chris,
I think patches 3 and 4 of this series can go through either the
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/20/2013 11:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
The structs wrapped with the SOC ifdefs are small enough where having
them always there shouldn't be a big overhead. Removing the ifdefs
also makes the code a little cleaner.
I think patches 3 and 4
On 03/06/2013 03:54 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/20/2013 11:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
The structs wrapped with the SOC ifdefs are small enough where having
them always there shouldn't be a big overhead. Removing the ifdefs
also makes the code
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
Via the MMC tree with an ack sounds good
OK, thanks. Patches 3/4 and 4/4,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Thanks, both pushed out to mmc-next for 3.10 now.
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball c...@laptop.org http://printf.net/
One Laptop
The structs wrapped with the SOC ifdefs are small enough where having
them always there shouldn't be a big overhead. Removing the ifdefs
also makes the code a little cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein rkl...@nvidia.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c |8
1 file changed, 8
On 02/20/2013 11:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
The structs wrapped with the SOC ifdefs are small enough where having
them always there shouldn't be a big overhead. Removing the ifdefs
also makes the code a little cleaner.
Patch 3 and 4 to the MMC driver look fine. But I'd ask Chris to hold off
