Re: [PATCH 5/6] mmc: sh-mmcif: no need to call pm_runtime_suspend on error

2014-06-04 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 4 June 2014 13:42, Ben Dooks wrote: > The pm_runtime call should implicitly disable the device once the > probe is over if there is no explicit reference gained. There is no > need to call pm_runtime_suspend() before the pm_runtime_disable() > call. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks Signed-off-by:

[PATCH 5/6] mmc: sh-mmcif: no need to call pm_runtime_suspend on error

2014-06-04 Thread Ben Dooks
The pm_runtime call should implicitly disable the device once the probe is over if there is no explicit reference gained. There is no need to call pm_runtime_suspend() before the pm_runtime_disable() call. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks --- drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 ins

[PATCH 5/6] mmc: sh-mmcif: no need to call pm_runtime_suspend on error

2014-04-01 Thread Ben Dooks
The pm_runtime call should implicitly disable the device once the probe is over if there is no explicit reference gained. There is no need to call pm_runtime_suspend() before the pm_runtime_disable() call. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks --- drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 ins