Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support

2012-08-07 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Tue, Jul 24 2012, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > Hello, > > I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by > Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for > cd-inverted property since it was redundant with g

Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support

2012-07-24 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 24 July 2012, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: > I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by > Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for > cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings. > > I thought we were agre

[PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] atmel-mci device tree support

2012-07-24 Thread ludovic.desroches
From: Ludovic Desroches Hello, I resend this set of patches because patches 2, 3 and 4 were acked by Jean-Christophe. Patch 1 was also acked by Jean-Christophe excepted for cd-inverted property since it was redundant with gpio bindings. I thought we were agree to go ahead since it was a common