Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:48:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Nothing wrong in that, only right.. Do you want me to float a patch for
this or you can get that done along with your series?
I'll send a follow-up mini-series of five
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 06:27:06PM +, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:48:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Nothing wrong in that, only right.. Do you want me to float a patch for
this or you can get that done along
Hi Russell,
On Sat, Feb 22 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I'll send a follow-up mini-series of five patches for it. It shouldn't
depend all that much on the bigger series - and I think the first two
patches could well do with going into -rc.
Thanks. Since testing resources might
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:48:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Nothing wrong in that, only right.. Do you want me to float a patch for
this or you can get that done along with your series?
I'll send a follow-up mini-series of five patches for it. It shouldn't
depend all that much on the bigger
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:25:12PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Absolutely, it will work.
Thanks for your efforts in cleaning up this stuff..
I'll send a few patches in a moment. First through, I've just found this
gem:
static int sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
...
sdhci
On 20 February 2014 16:29, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
I'll send a few patches in a moment. First through, I've just found this
gem:
Yeah, 'gem' is the real word for this precious code :)
static int sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
...
sdhci =
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:43:19AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Adding ST people as well who have access to boards and are working on SPEAr.
On 18 February 2014 23:27, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
1) You're controlling the card power GPIO via the insertion/removal
On 19 February 2014 15:13, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:43:19AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Adding ST people as well who have access to boards and are working on SPEAr.
On 18 February 2014 23:27, Russell King - ARM Linux
On 19 February 2014 15:22, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
Are you aware that power control to the card is part of the MMC/SD/SDIO
spec - and part of the protocol talking to the card? Hence why the
mmc layer has support for its control built-in.
Yeah, almost everything
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:39:35PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 19 February 2014 15:22, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
If you don't want to use a regulator, then the right way to do this is to
use the set_ios callback and check the power field - anything which is not
Thanks for removing my ST email id from this mail, I was about to do that
this time :)
On 19 February 2014 16:20, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:39:35PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
I didn't get that completely here.. sorry completely out of
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:09:38PM +, Russell King wrote:
There's no requirement to have the card tasklet separate now that we
have a threaded interrupt handler, so kill this and move the called
code into the threaded part of the handler.
This patch breaks sdhci-spear's build due to this:
Adding ST people as well who have access to boards and are working on SPEAr.
On 18 February 2014 23:27, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:09:38PM +, Russell King wrote:
There's no requirement to have the card tasklet separate now that we
have
13 matches
Mail list logo
