4:56 AM
> To: Huang Changming-R66093
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Anton Vorontsov; Zhang Haijun-B42677
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] Powerpc eSDHC Recover from the ADMA error
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 13 2012, Huang Changming-R66093 wrote:
> > Hi, Chris,
> > This patch
Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang
Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov
CC: Chris Ball
---
changes for v4:
- Correct inconsistent issue
changes for v3:
- Correct the if statement in function workground
changes for v2:
- Invert the condition of the if statement
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 13 2012, Huang Changming-R66093 wrote:
> Hi, Chris,
> This patch has been ACKed by Anton on Sep 20.
> Have you any comment about it?
Something weird has happened with this patch -- the latest version has
no commit message even though an earlier version did, and there seem
to be t
; Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Huang Changming-R66093
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] Powerpc eSDHC Recover from the ADMA error
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:19:23AM +0800, haijun.zh...@freescale.com
> wrote:
> > From: Haijun Zhang
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
> >
-B42677
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Huang Changming-R66093
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] Powerpc eSDHC Recover from the ADMA error
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:19:23AM +0800, haijun.zh...@freescale.com
> wrote:
> > From: Haijun Zhang
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haijun
; Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Huang Changming-R66093
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] Powerpc eSDHC Recover from the ADMA error
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:19:23AM +0800, haijun.zh...@freescale.com
> wrote:
> > From: Haijun Zhang
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:19:23AM +0800, haijun.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Haijun Zhang
>
> Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang
> CC: Anton Vorontsov
> ---
This one looks perfect, thanks!
Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov
> changes for v4:
> - Correct inconsiste
From: Haijun Zhang
Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang
CC: Anton Vorontsov
---
changes for v4:
- Correct inconsistent issue
changes for v3:
- Correct the if statement in function workground
changes for v2:
- Invert the condition of the if statement
Hi,
Anyone has some comment?
Best Regards
Jerry Huang
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang Haijun-B42677
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 3:36 PM
> To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Zhang Haijun-B42677; Huang Changming-R66093
> Subject: [PATCH V4] Powerpc eSDHC Rec
From: Haijun Zhang
False ADMA Error might be reported when ADMA is used for multiple block
read command with Stop at Block Gap. If PROCTL[SABGREQ] is set
when the particular block's data is received by the System side logic
before entire block(with CRC) data is received by the SD side logic,
and
10 matches
Mail list logo