Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 04:36:32PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
>
>> Even though the i.MX21 SDHC module has the same revision number as the i.MX27
>> one there are a few differences!!
>>
> Looks like this wasn't merged. Are you interested in resubmitting i
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 04:36:32PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
> Even though the i.MX21 SDHC module has the same revision number as the i.MX27
> one there are a few differences!!
> Some interrupt enables are inverted.
> FIFO is only 16 bits wide.
> The argument i
Even though the i.MX21 SDHC module has the same revision number as the i.MX27
one there are a few differences!!
Some interrupt enables are inverted.
FIFO is only 16 bits wide.
The argument is written to 2x16bit registers (vs 1x32).
Interrupts must be acknowledged via
