Re: [PATCH V8] mmc : Add i.MX21 support to mxcmmc driver

2010-09-16 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:02:44AM +0200, Martin Fuzzey wrote: > Even though the i.MX21 SDHC module has the same revision number as the i.MX27 > one there are a few differences!! > Some interrupt enables are inverted. > FIFO is only 16 bits wide. > The argument is written to

Re: [PATCH V8] mmc : Add i.MX21 support to mxcmmc driver

2010-09-13 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Pavel, Sascha, On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:02:44AM +0200, Martin Fuzzey wrote: > Even though the i.MX21 SDHC module has the same revision number as the i.MX27 > one there are a few differences!! > Some interrupt enables are inverted. > FIFO is only 16 bits wide. > The ar

[PATCH V8] mmc : Add i.MX21 support to mxcmmc driver

2010-09-09 Thread Martin Fuzzey
Even though the i.MX21 SDHC module has the same revision number as the i.MX27 one there are a few differences!! Some interrupt enables are inverted. FIFO is only 16 bits wide. The argument is written to 2x16bit registers (vs 1x32). Interrupts must be acknowledged via