>You shouldn't do this here.
>
>You didn't comment about or mentioned this change, but I guess you did
>it because you (quite reasonably) didn't want the card to be powered
>off as soon as mmc_blk_issue_rq() completes, and instead, you
>preferred to wait until some period of inactivity time passes.
Hi Yunpeng,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Yunpeng Gao wrote:
> static int mmc_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return pm_runtime_suspend(dev);
> + return pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 100);
You shouldn't do this here.
You didn't comment about or mentioned this change, but I
>From cac07f43de68615cca9f01f619870fdce05df2a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yunpeng Gao
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:00:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Do some changes in mmc core layer to enable mmc card runtime
pm.
Seems current runtime PM support in mmc core layer has some problems:
1. If host con
