On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:01 +0200, ext Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Luciano, Ohad,
>
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > I have tested this on my beagle board with the wl1271 patches that Ohad
> > provided and it seems to be working fine. I've also created a small
> >
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Yes, can do -- the patchset looks good, and I've just pushed patches
> 1-9 (the MMC patches) to mmc-next.
Thanks, Chris.
> Please go ahead and submit the
> two wl1271 patches through wireless-testing whenever you're ready.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
>
Hi Luciano, Ohad,
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:32:16PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> I have tested this on my beagle board with the wl1271 patches that Ohad
> provided and it seems to be working fine. I've also created a small
> script to stress test the implementation a little bit and didn't see
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 13:54 +0200, ext Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Introduce SDIO runtime PM support:
>
> 1. Power to SDIO cards is kept low until one of its functions is bound
>(i.e. a matching driver is successfully probed)
>
> 2. If the matching driver supports runtime PM, power to the card is
Introduce SDIO runtime PM support:
1. Power to SDIO cards is kept low until one of its functions is bound
(i.e. a matching driver is successfully probed)
2. If the matching driver supports runtime PM, power to the card is
dropped soon after probe() returns. It is then up to the driver
to
