On 21 December 2015 at 14:59, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 21 December 2015 at 14:41, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:23:17PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 21 December 2015 at 13:51, Russell King - ARM Linux
>>>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:25:53PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Huh. The merge ends up in a quite complicated conflict to resolve for
> me. And I am running out of time.
Sorry, I'm out of time too - I've still a number of things to do
commercially, I have to get several pull requests out that I've
On 21 December 2015 at 13:51, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:35:36PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> I decided to try to apply it for my next branch, to get some good test
>> coverage. Although, it failed when reaching patch 8. Would you mind
>>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:23:17PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 21 December 2015 at 13:51, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:35:36PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> I decided to try to apply it for my next branch, to get some good test
> >>
On 21 December 2015 at 14:41, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:23:17PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 21 December 2015 at 13:51, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:35:36PM +0100, Ulf
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:39:56AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> - Fixing the SDHCI timeout calculation code to correctly round timeouts
> up rather than down, and correctly calculate the time (in microseconds)
> for a certain number of card clocks.
What I didn't point out, but
This all started with a report from an iMX6 Hummingboard user that
they were seeing regular "mmc0: Got data interrupt 0x0002 even
though no data operation was in progress." messages with 4.4-rc and
additional patches to enable UHS support in DT for the platform.
When I tested 4.4-rc on an
On 21 December 2015 at 12:39, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> This all started with a report from an iMX6 Hummingboard user that
> they were seeing regular "mmc0: Got data interrupt 0x0002 even
> though no data operation was in progress." messages with 4.4-rc and
>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:35:36PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> I decided to try to apply it for my next branch, to get some good test
> coverage. Although, it failed when reaching patch 8. Would you mind
> posting yet another new re-based version, please.
Given that these are _fixes_ and need to