On 03/30/2015 01:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 02/26/2015 02:10 PM, Peter Griffin wrote:
The nodes have been split to allow as much commonality as possible.
The stih407 has a silicon bug with
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 02/26/2015 02:10 PM, Peter Griffin wrote:
The nodes have been split to allow as much commonality as possible.
The stih407 has a silicon bug with eMMC UHS modes (with top regs)
and as such doesn't have any of the uhs dt properties.
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 02/26/2015 02:10 PM, Peter Griffin wrote:
The nodes have been split to allow as much commonality as possible.
The stih407 has a silicon bug with eMMC UHS modes (with top regs)
and
On 02/26/2015 02:10 PM, Peter Griffin wrote:
The nodes have been split to allow as much commonality as possible.
The stih407 has a silicon bug with eMMC UHS modes (with top regs)
and as such doesn't have any of the uhs dt properties.
Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin peter.grif...@linaro.org
---
The nodes have been split to allow as much commonality as possible.
The stih407 has a silicon bug with eMMC UHS modes (with top regs)
and as such doesn't have any of the uhs dt properties.
Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin peter.grif...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 30