On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:42:21AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Simon
Hi Guennadi,
[Added Laurent to CC]
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:42:21AM +0900, Magnus Damm
Hi Magnus
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Magnus Damm wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
[Added Laurent to CC]
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
My take on this is the following: having N optionally available on
different IP-versions features, I'd rather have N DT properties,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:24:20PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
+* Toshiba Mobile IO SD/MMC controller
+
+The tmio-mmc driver doesn't probe its devices actively, instead its
binding
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:24:20PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
+* Toshiba Mobile IO SD/MMC controller
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:42:21AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:24:20PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2013,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:42:21AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:09:06AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:42:21AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu,
On Thursday 07 February 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
Please write the binding in a way that does not refer to a specific
implementation in Linux: The binding should describe the hardware
independent of details in the driver. In particular, I think you
should not refer to the
Define device-tree bindings for the tmio-mmc driver to be able to specify
parameters, currently provided in platform data.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de
---
v3: make the property to set TMIO_MMC_SDIO_IRQ global
On Wednesday 06 February 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
+* Toshiba Mobile IO SD/MMC controller
+
+The tmio-mmc driver doesn't probe its devices actively, instead its binding
to
+devices is managed by either MFD drivers or by the sh_mobile_sdhi platform
+driver. Those drivers supply the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:24:20PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
+* Toshiba Mobile IO SD/MMC controller
+
+The tmio-mmc driver doesn't probe its devices actively, instead its
binding to
+devices is managed by either MFD drivers
13 matches
Mail list logo
