Hi,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Sonny Rao wrote:
>> Do you see some performance degradation with some other variants of
>> dw_mmc host controller with current ToT?
>
> Looks like Doug test it and saw a performance improvement on rk3288
> Thanks!
Yup, all good. I tested with mmc_test before
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Doug / Sonny
> New year greetings!!
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Alim,
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> From: Seungwon Jeon
>>>
>>> Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor tabl
Hi Doug / Sonny
New year greetings!!
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Alim,
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> From: Seungwon Jeon
>>
>> Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor table in IDMAC,
>> the dw_mmc host driver is allowed to receive only
Alim,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> From: Seungwon Jeon
>
> Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor table in IDMAC,
> the dw_mmc host driver is allowed to receive only maximum
> 128KB block length in one request. This is caused by setting
> improper max_blk_count. It n
From: Seungwon Jeon
Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor table in IDMAC,
the dw_mmc host driver is allowed to receive only maximum
128KB block length in one request. This is caused by setting
improper max_blk_count. It needs to be e adjusted so that
descriptor table is used fully. It is fou
