On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Ladislav Michl
wrote:
> Ah, there is no valid reason to make it bitfield, right? Whole struct is
> not well layed wtr alignment, but please do not make it any worse. That is
> my last complain, I swear ;-). Thank you for your patience.
>
> Other than that, tested
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:23:59AM -0800, Cory Maccarrone wrote:
> The omap850 and omap730 use 16-bit registers instead of 32-bit, requiring
> a modification of the register addresses in the mmc-omap driver. To resolve
> this, a bit shift is performed on base register addresses, either by 1 or 2
>
* Cory Maccarrone [091123 08:23]:
> The omap850 and omap730 use 16-bit registers instead of 32-bit, requiring
> a modification of the register addresses in the mmc-omap driver. To resolve
> this, a bit shift is performed on base register addresses, either by 1 or 2
> bits depending on the CPU in
The omap850 and omap730 use 16-bit registers instead of 32-bit, requiring
a modification of the register addresses in the mmc-omap driver. To resolve
this, a bit shift is performed on base register addresses, either by 1 or 2
bits depending on the CPU in use. This yields the correct registers for
