Hi,
On Mon, Jun 27 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
I'll need to rebase mmc-next onto linux-next before I can merge it,
because the mach-imx/ board files you're modifying do not exist in
Linus' tree. (I don't mind doing that, but it might be easier if
you had the ARM patches go in via a different tree
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:41:47PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
The card-present polling for sdhci based driver is very expensive
in terms of the impact to system performance. We observe a few
system performance issues from Freescale and Linaro on mx5 platforms,
which have been proved
Hi Shawn,
On Sun, Jun 26 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimxsd25-baseboard.c |3 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimxsd35-baseboard.c |3 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx25_3ds.c |2 +
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm043.c|2
The card-present polling for sdhci based driver is very expensive
in terms of the impact to system performance. We observe a few
system performance issues from Freescale and Linaro on mx5 platforms,
which have been proved card polling related.
The patch set extends the current sdhci-esdhc-imx
