On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:28:46PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 15 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts
both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and
dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is
On Monday 28 January 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com wrote:
Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts
both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and
dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is
On Tuesday 15 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts
both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and
dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is
instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will be
made.
Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts
both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and
dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is
instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will be
made.
This allows for a much cleaner migration of drivers