On 12/07/12 08:02, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi, Adrian,
On 06/14/2012 10:46 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 08/06/12 07:39, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O requests are
Thanks for comment.
I will test and send the patch within this week.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 07/12/2012 03:00 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 12/07/12 08:02, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi, Adrian,
On 06/14/2012 10:46 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 08/06/12 07:39, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Enable
Hi, Adrian,
On 06/14/2012 10:46 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 08/06/12 07:39, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O requests are finished, run
BKOPS if required. Should
On Fri, July 6, 2012 9:47 am, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O requests are finished, run
BKOPS if required. Should
Hi,
On 07/08/2012 07:13 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2012 9:47 am, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 08 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
I think MMC_CAP2_BKOPS should be removed. If the card BKOPs were already
enabled, the host must support BKOPs. Therefore, in mmc_start_bkops we
should check only if card-ext_csd.bkops_en is set.
If bkops bit is set, it means that use the bkops by
On 07/09/2012 11:48 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 08 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
I think MMC_CAP2_BKOPS should be removed. If the card BKOPs were already
enabled, the host must support BKOPs. Therefore, in mmc_start_bkops we
should check only if card-ext_csd.bkops_en is set.
If
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 09 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
On 07/09/2012 11:48 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 08 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
I think MMC_CAP2_BKOPS should be removed. If the card BKOPs were already
enabled, the host must support BKOPs. Therefore, in mmc_start_bkops we
should
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O requests are finished, run
BKOPS if required. Should read/write operations be requested
during BKOPS, first
;
Konstantin Dorfman; Adrian Hunter; Maya Erez; Ulf Hansson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] mmc: support BKOPS feature for eMMC
Hi Subhash,
On 06/13/2012 09:45 PM, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
Hi Jaehoon,
Find few comments inline below. Also, periodic BKOPs support was present
in
v8 but now you have
On 08/06/12 07:39, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O requests are finished, run
BKOPS if required. Should read/write operations be requested
during BKOPS, first issue
Hello Dong,
On Wed, June 13, 2012 3:40 pm, Dong, Chuanxiao wrote:
Hi Jaehoon,
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c index
0b6141d..9adb004 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -41,6 +41,12 @@
#include sd_ops.h
#include
Hello Adrian,
On Thu, June 14, 2012 4:46 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 08/06/12 07:39, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O requests are finished, run
BKOPS if required.
Hi, Dong,
On 06/13/2012 09:40 PM, Dong, Chuanxiao wrote:
Hi Jaehoon,
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c index
0b6141d..9adb004 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -41,6 +41,12 @@
#include sd_ops.h
#include sdio_ops.h
+/*
Hi Subhash,
On 06/13/2012 09:45 PM, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
Hi Jaehoon,
Find few comments inline below. Also, periodic BKOPs support was present in
v8 but now you have removed it in v9. Is there any reason for it?
Yes, there is the periodic bkops in v-8. But, i have discussed this with
On 06/13/2012 10:53 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com wrote:
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O requests are finished, run
BKOPS
On Tue, June 12, 2012 8:07 pm, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
On 06/12/2012 07:58 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
@@ -359,12 +443,15 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct
mmc_host
*host,
if (!err areq)
start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq-mrq);
- if (host-areq)
+ if
@@ -359,12 +443,15 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct
mmc_host
*host,
if (!err areq)
start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq-mrq);
- if (host-areq)
+ if (host-areq) {
+ if (!areq host-areq mmc_card_mmc(host-card))
+
On 06/12/2012 07:58 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
@@ -359,12 +443,15 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct
mmc_host
*host,
if (!err areq)
start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq-mrq);
-if (host-areq)
+if (host-areq) {
+if (!areq host-areq
Enable eMMC background operations (BKOPS) feature.
If URGENT_BKOPS is set after a response, note that BKOPS
are required. After all I/O requests are finished, run
BKOPS if required. Should read/write operations be requested
during BKOPS, first issue HPI to interrupt the ongoing BKOPS
and then
20 matches
Mail list logo
