Hi,
On Mon, Feb 06 2012, Saugata Das wrote:
Thanks for the info. Perhaps the initial MMC-4.5 device samples do not
implement this command well. Yes, this feature is good to have in the
kernel. I shall wait for some more comments on the proposed
implementation before submitting the patch.
I'm
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 01 2012, Saugata Das wrote:
From: Saugata Das saugata@linaro.org
This patch groups the read or write transfers to eMMC in different contexts
based on the block number. Transfers to consecutive blocks are grouped to a
common context. So several small transfers combine to
On 02/03/2012 01:08 AM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Saugata Das saugata@stericsson.com
wrote:
From: Saugata Das saugata@linaro.org
This patch groups the read or write transfers to eMMC in different contexts
based on the block number. Transfers to
On 2 February 2012 21:38, S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Saugata Das saugata@stericsson.com
wrote:
From: Saugata Das saugata@linaro.org
This patch groups the read or write transfers to eMMC in different contexts
based on the block number.
On 3 February 2012 08:15, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/03/2012 01:08 AM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Saugata Das saugata@stericsson.com
wrote:
From: Saugata Das saugata@linaro.org
This patch groups the read or write transfers to eMMC
From: Saugata Das saugata@linaro.org
This patch groups the read or write transfers to eMMC in different contexts
based on the block number. Transfers to consecutive blocks are grouped to a
common context. So several small transfers combine to give performance like
a large multi block
