RE: [RFC] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the max_blk_count in IDMAC

2012-02-27 Thread Seungwon Jeon
Will Newton wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > > Will Newton wrote: > >> 2012/2/23 Seungwon Jeon : > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor table in IDMAC, > >> > the dw_mmc host driver is allowed to receive only maximum > >> > 128KB

Re: [RFC] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the max_blk_count in IDMAC

2012-02-24 Thread Will Newton
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > Will Newton wrote: >> 2012/2/23 Seungwon Jeon : >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor table in IDMAC, >> > the dw_mmc host driver is allowed to receive only maximum >> > 128KB block length in one request. This is

RE: [RFC] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the max_blk_count in IDMAC

2012-02-23 Thread Seungwon Jeon
Will Newton wrote: > 2012/2/23 Seungwon Jeon : > > Hi all, > > > > Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor table in IDMAC, > > the dw_mmc host driver is allowed to receive only maximum > > 128KB block length in one request. This is caused by setting > > improper max_blk_count. It needs to be e

Re: [RFC] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the max_blk_count in IDMAC

2012-02-23 Thread Will Newton
2012/2/23 Seungwon Jeon : > Hi all, > > Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor table in IDMAC, > the dw_mmc host driver is allowed to receive only maximum > 128KB block length in one request. This is caused by setting > improper max_blk_count. It needs to be e adjusted so that > descriptor tabl

[RFC] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the max_blk_count in IDMAC

2012-02-22 Thread Seungwon Jeon
Hi all, Even though 1MB is reserved for descriptor table in IDMAC, the dw_mmc host driver is allowed to receive only maximum 128KB block length in one request. This is caused by setting improper max_blk_count. It needs to be e adjusted so that descriptor table is used fully. It is found that the