Quoting Ulf Hansson (2015-01-15 02:04:04)
> On 15 January 2015 at 10:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
> > On czw, 2015-01-15 at 09:20 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> + Mike, Stephen (Clock maintainers)
> >>
> >> On 12 January 2015 at 10:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >
On 12 January 2015 at 10:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would like to hear some comments about idea of scaling MMC clock
> frequency. The basic idea is to lower the clock when device is
> completely idle or not busy enough.
>
> The patchset adds MMC card as a devfreq device and uses
On 15 January 2015 at 10:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> On czw, 2015-01-15 at 09:20 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> + Mike, Stephen (Clock maintainers)
>>
>> On 12 January 2015 at 10:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> > I would like to hear some comments about idea of scaling
On czw, 2015-01-15 at 09:20 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Mike, Stephen (Clock maintainers)
>
> On 12 January 2015 at 10:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I would like to hear some comments about idea of scaling MMC clock
> > frequency. The basic idea is to lower the clock when
+ Mike, Stephen (Clock maintainers)
On 12 January 2015 at 10:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would like to hear some comments about idea of scaling MMC clock
> frequency. The basic idea is to lower the clock when device is
> completely idle or not busy enough.
We already have host d
Hi,
I would like to hear some comments about idea of scaling MMC clock
frequency. The basic idea is to lower the clock when device is
completely idle or not busy enough.
The patchset adds MMC card as a devfreq device and uses simple_ondemand
as governor. In idle this gave benefits (less energy c