Re: [RFC 00/50] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-06-07 Thread boris brezillon
On 07/06/2013 12:14, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: On 06/07/2013 11:32 AM, boris brezillon wrote: On 07/06/2013 11:22, Nicolas Ferre wrote: On 07/06/2013 10:34, Boris BREZILLON : Hello, This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation to common clk framework. Before discussion begi

Re: [RFC 00/50] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-06-07 Thread boris brezillon
On 07/06/2013 11:22, Nicolas Ferre wrote: On 07/06/2013 10:34, Boris BREZILLON : Hello, This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation to common clk framework. Before discussion begins I would like to give my kudos to you Boris! This is huge work and I thank you for it: It

[RFC 00/50] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-06-07 Thread Boris BREZILLON
Hello, This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation to common clk framework. Most of the clock provided by the PMC (Power Management Controller) are implemented : - main clock (main oscillator) - pll clocks - master clock - programmable clocks - utmi clock - peripheral clocks

Re: [RFC 00/50] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-06-07 Thread Gregory CLEMENT
On 06/07/2013 11:32 AM, boris brezillon wrote: > On 07/06/2013 11:22, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 07/06/2013 10:34, Boris BREZILLON : >>> Hello, >>> >>> This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation >>> to common clk framework. >> >> Before discussion begins I would like to give

Re: [RFC 00/50] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-06-07 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 07/06/2013 10:34, Boris BREZILLON : Hello, This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation to common clk framework. Before discussion begins I would like to give my kudos to you Boris! This is huge work and I thank you for it: It is so great! I am sure that Jean-Christo