On 5 December 2014 at 18:40, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here are some patches to move re-tuning support out of
> sdhci and into the core, and add support for HS400
> re-tuning.
>
> Currently sdhci does re-tuning transparently by
> calling sdhci_execute_tuning() from its ->request()
> function.
On 19/12/14 16:07, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 05/12/14 19:40, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Here are some patches to move re-tuning support out of
>> sdhci and into the core, and add support for HS400
>> re-tuning.
>>
>> Currently sdhci does re-tuning transparently by
>> calling sdhci_execute_tun
On 19 December 2014 at 15:07, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 05/12/14 19:40, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Here are some patches to move re-tuning support out of
>> sdhci and into the core, and add support for HS400
>> re-tuning.
>>
>> Currently sdhci does re-tuning transparently by
>> calling sdhci
On 05/12/14 19:40, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here are some patches to move re-tuning support out of
> sdhci and into the core, and add support for HS400
> re-tuning.
>
> Currently sdhci does re-tuning transparently by
> calling sdhci_execute_tuning() from its ->request()
> function.
>
> The
Hi
Here are some patches to move re-tuning support out of
sdhci and into the core, and add support for HS400
re-tuning.
Currently sdhci does re-tuning transparently by
calling sdhci_execute_tuning() from its ->request()
function.
The problem with HS400 re-tuning is that it must be
done in HS200
