On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:58:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > On 11/30/2015 04:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Peter Ujfalusi
> >> wrote:
> >>> Treat
On 11/30/2015 04:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Treat as true condition the case when the mask is NULL.
>
> What do you think about setting some default (all "on") mask when mask
> is not supplied?
Probably
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 04:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Peter Ujfalusi
>> wrote:
>>> Treat as true condition the case when the mask is NULL.
>>
>> What do you think
Treat as true condition the case when the mask is NULL.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi
---
drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
index daf54a39bcc7..52c3eee48e2e 100644
---
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Treat as true condition the case when the mask is NULL.
What do you think about setting some default (all "on") mask when mask
is not supplied?
I don't know for sure but there might be cases when you don't want