@linux-foundation.org;
> roel.kl...@gmail.com; libertas-
> d...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [patch 077/232] sdio: fix read buffer overflow
>
> David Vrabel wrote:
> > David Vrabel wrote:
> >> It's harmless if the tuple contains fewer so I think we should just tr
David Vrabel wrote:
> David Vrabel wrote:
>> It's harmless if the tuple contains fewer so I think we should just try
>> and parse as many strings as possible. Does this patch fix your regression?
>
> I spelt the field name wrong in the comment. Use this patch instead,
> please.
Works for me, so
David Vrabel wrote:
>
> It's harmless if the tuple contains fewer so I think we should just try
> and parse as many strings as possible. Does this patch fix your regression?
I spelt the field name wrong in the comment. Use this patch instead,
please.
David
--
David Vrabel, Senior Software Eng
Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch is causing a regression with libertas 8686.
> It's only finding 3 strings which I'm guessing means
> it is an invalid CISTPL_VERS_1. Unfortunately the libertas_sdio
> code relies on a string in one of them to tell it what model of
> card we have.
>
Hi All,
This patch is causing a regression with libertas 8686.
It's only finding 3 strings which I'm guessing means
it is an invalid CISTPL_VERS_1. Unfortunately the libertas_sdio
code relies on a string in one of them to tell it what model of
card we have.
Can someone confirm what the CIS_VERS_1
From: Roel Kluin
Avoid buffer underrun when parsing an invalid CISTPL_VERS_1.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
Cc: David Vrabel
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
---
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_cis.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/mmc/core/sdio_cis.c~sdio-fix
