> I didn't get the same result..In my case, it's working fine.
> But as Bing's result, i will check more and share the result.
I want to add that my kernel is from "cros/release-R26-3701.B" branch with this
HEAD:
4e13a9c CHERRY-PICK: UPSTREAM: loop: prevent bdev freeing while device in use
Tha
Hi Seungwon,
I didn't get the same result..In my case, it's working fine.
But as Bing's result, i will check more and share the result.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 06/26/2013 10:53 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> Do you have the same result?
> Could you share the result?
>
> Thanks,
Hi Jaehoon,
Do you have the same result?
Could you share the result?
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
On Tuesday, June 25 2013, Bing Zhao wrote:
> > I think the proposal on the table is to take Seungwon's patches
> > instead of mine. Assuming they solve your problems, I'm OK with that.
> > I think he was r
> I think the proposal on the table is to take Seungwon's patches
> instead of mine. Assuming they solve your problems, I'm OK with that.
> I think he was requesting testing the first of his two patches alone
> and then both of his two patches together.
Test #1: Swungwon's patch #1 alone [1]
Te
Bing,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
>> > I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
>> >
>> > Without this patch, mmc got hung_task and rebooted eventually.
>> > With this patch applied, mmc returns CRC error instead of hung_task, and
>> > the error is handled
>>
Hi All,
I tested with Seungwon's patch and this patch.
I'm agreed with Seungwon's opinion.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 06/18/2013 09:36 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Seungwon,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>
Hi Doug,
> > I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
> >
> > Without this patch, mmc got hung_task and rebooted eventually.
> > With this patch applied, mmc returns CRC error instead of hung_task, and
> > the error is handled
> gracefully.
>
> Have you tried one or both or Seungwon's fixes wit
Bing,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi Seungwon,
>
>> > I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
>> > the patches. You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
>> > patches, right?
>> Did you test the patch?
>> I wonder that both are g
Hi Seungwon,
> > I don't have the failing unit myself, so we'll have to get Bing to try
> > the patches. You are suggesting that we try applying both of your
> > patches, right?
> Did you test the patch?
> I wonder that both are good for your side.
I tested Doug's patch on my failing unit.
With
On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Seungwon,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> >> > There are two solutions we have applied.
> >>
> >> I'm a little confused. Have you already applied one or both of the
> >> solutions you list below, or are you proposing
Seungwon,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>> > There are two solutions we have applied.
>>
>> I'm a little confused. Have you already applied one or both of the
>> solutions you list below, or are you proposing them as alternates to
>> the patch I submitted?
> Yes, first o
On 04/10/2013 04:02 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 09, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Seungwon,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>>> I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
>>
>> Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part that
>>
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Seungwon,
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> > I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
>
> Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part that
> has an SDIO WiFi module by Marvell. Bing Zhao (CCe
Seungwon,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> I guess Doug are debugging it with wifi, right?
Yes, we're debugging it on the Samsung ARM Chromebook on a part that
has an SDIO WiFi module by Marvell. Bing Zhao (CCed) has a unit in
hand that generates lots of CRC errors and has
On Friday, April 05, 2013, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> You're right..it's something wrong.
> Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
>
> I will check until next week after test.
Doug Anderson, Jaehoon Chung,
Sorry for late response.
Could I explain
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 04/05/2013 05:18 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> You're right..it's something wrong.
> Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
>
> I will check until next week after test
Hi Doug,
You're right..it's something wrong.
Actually i didn't test with your patch, but your commit message is reasonable.
I will check until next week after test.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 03/27/2013 03:06 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Jaehoon,
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Jaehoon
Jaehoon,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Great..i have found the problem like this.
> I will check your patch..and share the result.
Did you have any time to check this patch?
Thanks!
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
Hi Doug,
Great..i have found the problem like this.
I will check your patch..and share the result.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 03/16/2013 06:29 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On a flaky piece of hardware that seems good at generating CRC errors,
> we have found that often times the CRC errors don
19 matches
Mail list logo
