Hello,
On Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:53 AM Chris Ball wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
The patch applies OK to 2.6.35. Is the bug present there as well? If
so, should we fix it in earlier kernels? If so then the way in which
we indicate this is
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
The patch applies OK to 2.6.35. Is the bug present there as well? If
so, should we fix it in earlier kernels? If so then the way in which
we indicate this is by
Hi Kyungmin,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 07:53:48PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
The patch applies OK to 2.6.35. Is the bug present there as well? If
so, should we
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
The patch applies OK to 2.6.35. Is the bug present there as well? If
so, should we fix it in earlier kernels? If so then the way in which
we indicate this is by adding
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
to the changelog.
Marek,
Hi Ben,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:22:05PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
If not all clocks has been defined in platform data, driver will cause
a null pointer dereference when it is being removed. This patch fixes
this issue.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com