On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:24:07AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Hmm, Mr Park and Co really need to learn how to handle the treatment of
> patches. I'm really disapointed that these patches get submitted without
> the proper authour accreditation. If this isn't sorted out then I for
> one will start t
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:29:38AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> >
>> > Most Samsung SoC have support for SDHCI block, so make the driver
>> > dependent on the Samsung platform instead on listing all SoCs in the
>> > Kcon
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:29:38AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >
> > Most Samsung SoC have support for SDHCI block, so make the driver
> > dependent on the Samsung platform instead on listing all SoCs in the
> > Kconfig (and updating it again when support for the new SoC v
Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
> Most Samsung SoC have support for SDHCI block, so make the driver
> dependent on the Samsung platform instead on listing all SoCs in the
> Kconfig (and updating it again when support for the new SoC variant is
> added).
>
Hi, Marek
Kyungmin Park already submitted same
